A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out concerning prospective neighbours above the construction of a wall at a coastal internet site inside a north Dublin suburb, a case which has captivated nationwide awareness pursuing an Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed family property at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of preparing breaches, environmental fears, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Moments report about René Collier and also the Irish Times posting about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has advanced right into a hugely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, wherever Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and a firm director respectively, find to create their household residence. The case happens to be emblematic of broader disputes along Eire’s coastline, where by progress pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of set up citizens. According to the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall becoming manufactured by their possible neighbours goes over and above the boundaries permitted less than scheduling authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both people of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions in their setting up authorization by building a wall further than the boundaries in their web page, resulting in an encroachment on the Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such regions are topic to rigorous controls less than European and Irish environmental law. Inside their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have Long lasting ecological consequences, especially inside of a sensitive coastal environment like Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They can be in breach in their organizing permission, and say the wall, which happens to be partly developed, is in the proper situation. Their authorized crew has characterised the motion being an make an effort to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The few accuse litigants of searching for to halt homebuilding in an effort to maintain their look at, an allegation that has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the guts of numerous coastal planning disputes, the place views of The ocean are both hugely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic initiatives with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded through ocean in storm to photograph the website, Based on sworn proof referenced while in the Irish Times. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments, a picture which has given that come to be emblematic of your depth from the dispute. These actions were not merely symbolic; they were being intended to Acquire visual proof from the wall’s posture relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances noted, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the drinking water throughout severe weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading through storm drinking water to photograph the positioning became one of the most placing descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely noted that these steps were cited to show the plaintiffs’ belief that the wall prolonged into an area afflicted by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached on.
The activities at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered intimately through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 grew to become broadly searched phrases as viewers sought to comprehend the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to more submissions on whether or not interim orders should be granted to halt building pending a complete Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a essential minute while in the authorized timeline.
In the core in the dispute is usually a disagreement above boundaries, scheduling compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely sustain which the wall, as manufactured, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into secured land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has been called meticulous in his assessment of scheduling files, maps, and ailments connected into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have equally stressed that their motion is motivated by issue for environmental defense and adherence to preparing legislation. They reject promises that the case is about preserving A personal view, insisting as a substitute that it's about making certain that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects authorized and ecological restrictions. In affidavits, they've got explained their prolonged-standing connection to the world and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On another side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a couple just trying to make a family residence in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches with a Special Location of Conservation and say that all functions have already been completed according to Qualified advice and accepted options. Their lawyers have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like entering the sea throughout a storm, don't alter the underlying points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how scheduling disputes are settled in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court docket dispute in excess of construction of wall at coastal website happens to be a shorthand description for just a condition that many observers see as increasingly common. As sea degrees increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the exact delineation in between personal land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is becoming far more contentious.
The Irish Instances René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 report about René Collier observed that the businessman had Formerly been associated with neighborhood advocacy on arranging and environmental troubles, though not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from very unique Experienced backgrounds can find themselves aligned in these disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some experiences spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand case.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site within the sea Irish Situations protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waist-high drinking water for the duration of a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations and René Collier waded by means of waist-large water all through a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Situations are phrases that appeared regularly in protection, reflecting both the physical fact in the coastline plus the symbolic nature with the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these steps demonstrated motivation; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the result continues to be unsure. The court docket must decide whether the wall as created complies with setting up permission and whether any encroachment right into a Distinctive Area of Conservation has transpired. The lawful arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and organizing situations. However the human element stays central: neighbours who need to Dwell alongside each other very long once the legal prices are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than design performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the case lengthen outside of that handle. For planners, builders, and people alike, the dispute serves as a reminder of the importance of clarity in setting up permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. Furthermore, it underscores how immediately an area disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for instance environmental defense and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand stays a place of normal beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre on the dispute stands partially developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it will eventually in the end be altered, taken out, or done as planned will rely on the court’s findings. Right up until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable proceed to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to one of the most closely viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.